ABOUT
There has been a growing interest over the last ten years or so in pluralizing the epistemological foundations of the field of comparative constitutional studies so that it becomes more attentive to non-Western perspectives on constitutionalism.
Partly this has to do with the delayed reception in comparative constitutional studies of something akin to the international-law subfield, TWAIL (Third World Approaches to International Law).
Another aspect has been the move to a more multipolar world since 2008, meaning that Western governance norms can no longer serve as the default standard by which the moral attractiveness of non-Western national constitutional systems is judged. Together, these two changes have triggered an upsurge in comparative scholarship on constitutional phenomena in non-Western settings.