In a liberal democracy, who gets to decide on the very recognition of an unenumerated fundamental right that can trump the will of the majority? This question often pits constitutional liberals against constitutional democrats, though a more fruitful inquiry is arguably to ask how the surrounding moral and cultural disagreements can be processed (though not necessarily settled) in ways that honor our dual commitment to liberal democracy. This paper seeks to reflect on the politics of fundamental rights by drawing lessons from Taiwan’s recent development in recognizing the fundamental right to same-sex marriage. In light of the Taiwan experience, this paper contends that judicial constitutionalism is but a form of political constitutionalism, and political leadership on the part of representative elites plays a crucial and indispensable role in securing and implementing a new fundamental right as so recognized by the constitutional court.
Our 2020 Annual Conference was scheduled to be held at the University of Wrocław in Poland on July 9-11, 2020.
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the ICON·S Executive Committee has decided to postpone our 2020 Conference to 2021. Our next Annual Conference will take place from July 8-10, 2021, in Wrocław, Poland.
Procedural details regarding the organization of the 2021 Conference will follow in the months ahead.Join ICON•S