Role of the constitutional justice in the review of international treaties and constitutional amendments resulting from war

The aim of the paper is to determine the role of the constitutional court in the process of amending the constitution forced by war. It concerns the situation when the armed conflict ended with a peace treaty, as well as when a particular constitutional change is a condition of war termination imposed by the aggressor.
What is the role of the constitutional court in the process of ratifying such an international treaty? Can the constitutional court assess the constitutionality of such an amendment? What could be the criteria of such scrutiny ?