The paper deals with abusive comparativism – a rule of law practice, whose main feature concentrates on reference to other jurisdictions or legal systems, without analyzing the broader constitutional, historical, or institutional contexts. Such a reference (often described as “whataboutism”) relies on a presumption of legality. The method “abuses” the basic rules of comparative law and ignores relevant aspects of the legal culture in a given jurisdiction. In this sense, the abusive comparativism might be seen as a legislative and/or judicial “cherry-picking”. The abusive comparativism aims, first of all, at broadening the scope of discretionary legislative powers, and secondly, it allows to undermine the independence of the state (constitutional) institutions.
We look forward to welcoming you on July 3-5, 2023 for our Annual Conference entitled "Islands and Ocean: Public Law in a Plural World." The conference will take place at the Victoria University of Wellington, in New Zealand. We will be announcing more details about the conference soon, including financial support to early career and global south scholars!