Populists and authoritarians have discovered constitutional identity (CI) for themselves as a practical excuse to sidestep transnational legal obligations, and to deviate from shared European values. This has led some scholars to suggest that the concept should be abandoned. However, as this paper argues, dismissing CI will not lead to the disappearance of the meanings imparted through it. Authoritarian populists will always seek legitimacy by integrating into existing legal discourses. We need to come to a more intimate understanding of constitutional identity abuse. The abuse of CI, I argue, shows in three ways: Firstly, through the elision of CI and constitutionalism, secondly, through the 'primordialisation' of CI claims as not rooted in law but in the essence of the political community, and thirdly, through 'constitutional solipsism' – the idea that CI is purely an expression of a form of communitarian subjectivity untethered from the relational entanglements of transnational law.
We look forward to welcoming you on July 3-5, 2023 for our Annual Conference entitled "Islands and Ocean: Public Law in a Plural World." The conference will take place at the Victoria University of Wellington, in New Zealand. We will be announcing more details about the conference soon, including financial support to early career and global south scholars!